More on using Twitter for quick mini reviews

I see Twitter as about 75% micro-blog and 25% IM, all of it with an obvious social aspect. To that end, I think (as I’ve said before) that it seems an excellent place to create and share reviews of newly released books, movies… anything that isn’t “instant” yet has a significant “first day” draw.

The trouble is coming up with an agreed upon convention for posting these. Twitter has few rules, which is a good thing. It’s up to the community to create the convention, as we have done in the case of typing ‘@ username’ to send a personal — yet public — message.

What’s the right convention for posting quick rating/reviews on Twitter? Here are a few ideas. Vote for the best by using one, or feel free to suggest another:

  • Twittereview - first one I used. Hard to spell. Too long.
  • Twitterwrap - nifty sounding, but could be too esoteric.
  • Tweecap - oh, I like that one. Sounds like “recap”. Though there isn’t enough room in Twitters 140 char to allow for a true recap.
  • Twitterize - as in ‘criticize’, but it sounds more like ‘to make into Twitter form”.
  • Tweigh - hated that as I wrote it.
  • Tweeview - seems simple enough.

I may start with the latter. Comments (or Tweets) are appreciated.

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 31st, 2007 at 7:29 am and is filed under Twitter noise. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No Comments

Be the first to comment on this entry.

Have your say

Fields in bold are required. Email addresses are never published or distributed.

Some HTML code is allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
URIs must be fully qualified (eg: http://www.domainname.com) and all tags must be properly closed.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted.

Please keep comments relevant. Off-topic, offensive or inappropriate comments may be edited or removed.